The whole week has seen an all too familiar topic and discussion creep up again in the Twittersphere and among different people in Africa's technology startup ecosystem. It is the question about racial bias as far as funding of tech startups go in Kenya, and even across Africa.

I say "creep up again" because it is an all too familiar topic over approximately the past decade. We have even covered it extensively in different forms on iAfrikan over the years. In 2014 I wrote an extensive article to understand black representation in South Africa's technology ecosystem. In 2019 Jacob Mugendi also wrote about the bias observed in Kenya leading to the conclusion that perhaps to raise money for a tech startup in Kenya, you must get a "White CEO." More recently, Ndzalo Mpangana had an in-depth interview with Aisha Pandor, Co-founder of SweepSouth, in which Aisha said that:

"But there have been challenges like trying to pitch our idea to investors who are mainly male and white, so in some cases struggled to connect with the impact potential (both ROI, economically and social) of what we’re trying to do."

There are many more articles, research, and commentary from both iAfrikan and others on the subject over the past decade. However, I can't help but think that surely at some point it becomes tiring to discuss the same thing and the same perceived results are being obtained?

Don't get me wrong, and I probably need to emphasize this, there is a bias which can be observed along racial lines. There are various reasons for this and among them, in some cases, is just racism.



However, and I am not making excuses for anyone (just an observation), in some cases, it might not be racial bias although the result might be race. To summarise, anyone who is investing doesn't just give money to anyone who asks. Not even to anyone whose business plan and business model makes sense. At some level, because we are humans and humans trade with humans, investors invest with people who "speak their language."

I am not talking language here in the sense of Sesotho, Swahili, or Yoruba, but rather a way of doing things. Unfortunately, this rears its head up as a race problem (as I said earlier, in some cases, it is just pure racism) as a result. You see this in other cases where the same investors would rather invest in an Ivy League or Oxford-educated African who has just "returned home" to start their startup.

But it is still tiring to talk about this same topic year in year out.

I dey tire Β Β―\_(ツ)_/Β―

On one hand, it sounds like we are begging for the right to have someone invest in our startups as Africans. Fair enough, if anyone is going to reap benefits from African consumers and market conditions they should empower Africans, at some level, in the process. However, and maybe it is just how I am wired, it just feels like when raising this topic annually we are going cap-in-hand and fighting (among ourselves) about having the right to receive these investments.

On the other hand, and why the discussion becomes tiring for me, we have to at some point execute solutions to solve this. Talking won't cut it anymore because we have BEEN talking.

One of the solutions being thrown around is the possibility of government regulation. I worry when I hear this because we have many case studies of Black Economic Empowerment in South Africa. Although well-intentioned, it ended being seen as a way to "empower" those who are politically connected.

Perhaps all this doesn't matter as Michael Jackson once sang:

"It don't matter if you're black or white"

Advertise here. E-mail us for more details.

TikTok’s popularity has raised eyebrows with some governments

Some African governments are starting to feel concerned about TikTok. In Egypt, Menna Abdel Aziz used social media to ask for protection after a sexual assault. She was arrested on various charges, including misusing social media. [Article]

South Africa's SweepSouth has received investment from Futuregrowth

An asset management company, Futuregrowth, has invested an undisclosed amount of venture capital funds into South Africa's SweepSouth. According to Futuregrowth, SweepSouth met all the criteria that are necessary for early-stage companies, namely: a large addressable market in the informal sector, disruptive, having a positive social impact on the economy and the management team has proven credentials in building the company to where it is now, as well as engaging in ongoing innovation. [Article]

New integrated digital finance and e-commerce platform launched

On this episode of the iAfrikan BYTES podcast, I am joined by Dr. Thabo Lehlokoe, Executive Chairman of Tafari Capital, a company in South Africa that has recently launched the Tafari App which allows individuals and businesses to set up their online shops and sell to consumers. Dr. Lehlokoe also shares some of the retail trends observed so far in 2020. [Podcast]

COVID-19 pandemic is changing Africa’s Digital Space

The impact of COVID-19 joins a long list of factors that expose Africa’s perceived economic backwardness; prompted by some of the infrastructures either lying in a poor state, being dormant, lagging on up-to-date trends or being summarily unavailable to the majority of the working population. [Article]

Cameroon is looking at ways to improve Internet connectivity

The government of Cameroon and stakeholders in the telecommunications sector have been looking at ways of upgrading Internet connectivity in the country. The stakeholders have also been brainstorming on how smaller or peripheral towns in the country’s ten administrative regions can be connected to high-speed Internet as the government continues to expand its digital economy ecosystem. [Article]

Quote of the day

"But there have been challenges like trying to pitch our idea to investors who are mainly male and white, so in some cases struggled to connect with the impact potential" (Tweet this)

Get in touch

Do you have any questions or comments about anything mentioned in today’s newsletter?

πŸ“§ E-mail us

🐦 Follow and Tweet @iAfrikan

Share this via: